Imposing a total science of autism on those in the field who know its limits and uncertainties, such is the ambition of Mr total science . Fasquelle and some “Les républicains” deputies, thanks to a draft resolution submitt to the National Assembly. Where do they get their complete science of autism? It comes from the 2012 recommendations drawn up by the High Authority of Health. However, the deputies are misusing these on several points.
The HAS recommendations are decision-making aids that aim to preserve the clinician’s discernment. By transforming these recommendations into injunctions, the deputies want to dictate to professionals what they must do and think, depriving them of responsibility for their actions and the necessary adaptation of these actions to the individuality of the patient.
Infringing on doctors’ freom to prescribe
in this way quickly l them to react in their thousands [1] ; while hospital psychologists and psychiatrists denounce the endangerment of academic freom, inseparable from any development and dissemination of scientific knowlge [2] .
With regard to autism treatment, the phone number list deputies.
who have certainly not taken the time to read the 465 pages of the HAS’s scientific argument. Naively believe that there are “scientifically validat methods that have proven their effectiveness”. However, this is 6 build backlinks and a better search engine presence not the case. The HAS is very cautious. Of the three recommend methods (ABA, Denver and TEACCH).
It considers that only the first two achieve “a scientific presumption” of effectiveness (grade B), the third “a low level of proof” (grade C).
None of the three achieves grade A
that of scientific validation [3] . There is a major reason for this: in meta-analyses it is regularly not that around 50% of children are not improv. And yet hindi directory this improvement only concerns “the intelligence quotient, communication skills and language”; As for the essential, namely “adaptive behaviors.
