Recently Jim Highsmith propos the Agile Triangle, which gives us a more solid basis for solving this problem. I have propos an extension to Highsmith’s triangle, resulting in a prism for project management bas on Lean-Agile. In this article I explain this strategy.
The Iron Triangle Traditional project management
theory is bas on the concept of the “iron triangle.” This is a graphic depiction of the three key considerations for managing projects: scope, cost algeria phone number library and schule (see Figure 1). The theory of this triangle indicates that we can keep two of these aspects fix, but not all three (i.e. if we fix cost and schule, we must be flexible with scope). In real life, the vast majority of companies try to fix all three, so flexibility is not allow, or is allow when it is too late. Many executives avoid fluctuations complete wordpress guide: what because they think it is a sign of failure and incompetence. The result is poor quality of the resulting belize lists products and services, and the one who pays the consequences is the customer.
Figure 1. The iron triangle
I was introduc to the iron triangle during a project management course many years ago. Since I have always been particularly interest in quality, when the instructor finish his explanation of the triangle I ask him where quality was locat. He thought about it for a moment and said that quality was implicitly at the center of the triangle. If that was true then why didn’t he mention it during his explanation? Besides, quality is too important to be “implicit.” I decid not to go back to that course.
