On the other hand, Apple’s iPod introduced a long-promised interface, based on a small touch screen, and aimed at devices intended for entertainment and quick information consultation, and especially popularized through the telephone that appeared shortly after. However, while this interface has been natural for a large number of people, it would undoubtedly be impractical and unergonomic for a general-purpose computer.
And of course we will continue to see new
Interfaces dedicated to specific tasks — the most successful ones will undoubtedly be the most transparent ones: Those that seamlessly integrate afghanistan phone number library into tasks, improving our lives without requiring us to even notice they exist. For example, how many people are aware of the amount of calculations that go on in a car? Isn’t it one of the best examples of ubiquitous computing that has quietly crept into our lives?
Other ideas
There have, of course, been many other proposals for general-purpose error connecting to the database computer interfaces, but they have not yet matured enough or are only applicable in very specific contexts. Some examples are:
Touch screens Beginning in the mid-1980s
Hewlett-Packard introduced belize lists its HP110 line of computers, which featured a touch-sensitive screen. This interface promised to be more agile and natural than the mouse (which requires a non-trivial level of coordination). And while this interface was moderately successful in areas such as kiosks (ATMs, gas stations), it was never fully accepted for use in general-purpose computers because of the unergonomic nature of having to constantly raise one’s hand to point at the screen.
